Machine-Created Evidence: A Myth of Objectivity? Bias can easily be an inherent part in machine-created evidence, experts say. By Rhys Dipshan, Legaltech News May 2, 2017 | 1 Comments share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. reprints Bias can easily be an inherent part in machine-created evidence, experts say. This premium content is reserved for Legal Technology subscribers. Continue reading by getting started with a subscription. Subscribe Now for Unlimited Access Already a subscriber? Log in now VIEW COMMENTS ( 1 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Bill Speros May 03, 2017 Thank you for focusing attention on this interesting and important topic. In related news, recently Attorney General Session’s US Department of Justice killed a commission that was examining—and in some instances debunking—various forensic technologies which employed unproven science and dubious techniques to generate highly-persuasive evidence regularly employed by prosecutors to convict people of serious crimes. Sessions orders Justice Dept. to end forensic science commission, suspend review policy. By Spencer S. Hsu, April 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM: washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/sessions-orders-justice-dept-to-end-forensic-science-commission-suspend-review-policy/2017/04/10/2dada0ca-1c96-11e7-9887-1a5314b56a08_story.html Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202785052507 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.