Will Wikipedia Wither Traditional Legal Citation?

, Legaltech News


Wikipedia is a popular source of information, in part because search engines prioritize the wiki in search results, says Gardere Wynne partner Peter Vogel. When will it become acceptable legal citation?

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Kevin N. Anderson

    The Utah Court of Appeals cited to Wikipedia to determine whether an exclusion in an insurance contract is ambiguous.


  • John Waid

    I am far from an expert, but Wikipedia's llimitations are well known. It's reputation for accuracy is not the best, articles can be easily changed, and verification is lacking. Personally, I cannot imagine Wikipedia could be cited for anything other than basic information (information that can be judicially noticed because it's common knowledge) until those prolems can be corrected.

  • Lulaine

    Great article, love the originality of the subject and the tough and pertinent questions brought to the table.

  • Erik Werfel

    Thanks for this interesting piece. it should be noted that generally speaking, Wikipedia entries can be edited by anyone, either anonymously or using a pseudonym, which means that an entry might be modified by someone with an interest in a matter. This ability to edit the information is probably good reason to require corroboration.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202577630116

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.